Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
In Peter Mullan's terrific movie about institutionalised abuse, The Magdalene Sisters, an archbishop treats the imprisoned girls to a Christmas showing of The Bells of St Mary's and the sadistic, power-mad sister in charge stands up and gives a cooing and ingratiating little speech about how she used to go to the movies with her father and how she liked the westerns best.

And the realisation dawns that not only does this terrible woman believe that God is on her side, she also, God help us, believes that she's cute.

Monsters never think of themselves as monstrous. Stalin loved drinking games. Hitler was fond of children and dogs. Mao went among his people with a great big silly grin on his face.

I won't (because I'm a bit of a fraidy cat) mention the names of any grinners, smirkers and jokers who are still alive and in power.

Sister makes her twee little jokes and the girls laugh at them.

The self-delusion of the ruler is perfectly matched to the self-abasement of the ruled.

Date: 2005-02-25 03:38 am (UTC)
ext_37604: (hazel)
From: [identity profile] glitzfrau.livejournal.com
and when he cried, the little children died in the streets.

Yes. There are a lot of nasty links between kitsch, sentiment, fascism and death. This is why I sa that irony is our only hope, even though that's about the least ironic statement I can muster.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2005-02-25 09:42 am (UTC)
ext_37604: (Default)
From: [identity profile] glitzfrau.livejournal.com
Is it? I thought it was Auden. Fool me!

Date: 2005-02-25 03:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
It's one of my quarrels with Tolkien and his school that they completely misrepresent the way evil presents itself. It isn't big and black and brazen, but has a sickly sweet charm and talks the language of patriotism and religion

Date: 2005-02-25 05:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lblanchard.livejournal.com
It's one of my quarrels with Tolkien and his school that they completely misrepresent the way evil presents itself. It isn't big and black and brazen, but has a sickly sweet charm and talks the language of patriotism and religion

My instinct here is to leap to Tolkien's defense. And in fact I will. The evil we know may have that sickly-sweet charm, but its effect is certainly big and black and brazen. Or to put it another way...

Taken individually, Tolkien's orcs were kind of goofy in a malignant way. Taken en masse, they're lethal.

And fear, real heart-stopping fear, is big and black and looming like a ringwraith in full sail. At least it is for me.

Date: 2005-02-25 06:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Tolkien presents good and evil in fairy tale terms. I guess I'm OK with it really.

But it would have been interesting (more interesting?) if Mordor had been given the kind of seductive glamour that the Third Reich had.

Date: 2005-02-25 06:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lblanchard.livejournal.com
Let's not lose sight of the fact that LOTR was intended as a sequel to The Hobbit -- a children's book -- and then took on another life. A children's book might have labored under the "seductive glamor" concept.

(Does we love our lovely LOTR, Precioussssss? Oh, yes we does)

Date: 2005-02-25 07:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I love Tolkien too.

When I was at school I had an enlightened English teacher who read us LOTR in weekly instalments (during the two final periods of a Friday afternoon.) This was in 1959-60, long before Tolkien became a cult.

Date: 2005-02-25 08:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lblanchard.livejournal.com
Wow. I don't believe it was available in the states that early. I bought an edition in 1966, which I think was also before it became a cult, but not much.

Date: 2005-02-25 08:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
For several years I felt a sort of proprietorial interest in Tolkien and when people went on about this cool new book they'd just discovered I would smile smugly and say, "well, actually...."

Date: 2005-02-25 07:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] four-thorns.livejournal.com
"But it would have been interesting (more interesting?) if Mordor had been given the kind of seductive glamour that the Third Reich had."

but... doesn't it, in some ways? LOTR can be sort of read as an allegory about WWII. saruman is certainly seduced by the power of mordor. maybe the "seductive glamor" would have been a little more evident if the army had been a human army and not an orc army-- although there were humans fighting on mordor's side- the pirates and the people from the south...

or perhaps, the ring portrays evil is more the way you're talking about. it tempts pretty much everyone with thoughts of the good they could do by wielding it- i'm thinking of boromir, galadriel, and gandalf, in particular- but it's really the ultimate artifact of sauron's evil.

just thinking out loud.

also, did you know that stalin tried to assassinate john wayne? i may have posted about this before.

Date: 2005-02-25 07:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Someone said that the Ring comes close to being the central character in LOTR. Maybe it was Peter Jackson, maybe it was Tolkien himself.

Jackson had a huge replica ring made so that he could stick it in the foreground of a shot and it would dwarf the actors behind.

I seem to remember hearing that about Stalin and Wayne- quite possibly from you. Do we know why Stalin ordered the hit?

Date: 2005-02-25 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] four-thorns.livejournal.com
stalin loved movies- particularly american cowboy movies- but he hated the fact that he liked those movies because their themes of individualism were so anathema to soviet idealogy. one night after watching some john wayne movies, he drunkenly ordered that assassins be sent to LA, but before they could get there, stalin died and brezhnev called off the hit.

Date: 2005-02-25 08:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saskia139.livejournal.com
If you have any interest in fantasy literature any more, I suggest having a look at a new book by Jacqueline Carey, author of the Kushiel trilogy. It's called Banewreaker, and it's the first half of an epic fantasy story told from the viewpoint of the "bad guys". It really left me wondering *who* was on the Side of Right in this story--the firstborn demigod who cut off his half of the world from his younger brother because younger brother (alias Big Bad Dark Lord) refused to take away his gift of sexual desire from mortals, or the Big Bad Dark Lord who hopes his sister still cares about him.

Date: 2005-02-25 08:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
That does sound interesting. I don't read a lot of fantasy, but I'm always up for something a little out of the ordinary.

The last fantasy series I read was Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy. That really had me hooked.

Date: 2005-02-25 09:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saskia139.livejournal.com
I haven't read Pullman, but my teenage stepdaughter *loved* His Dark Materials, and that's a strong point in its favour.

I understand what you mean about Tolkien. Saruman had a bit of the seductive thing going, but not enough self-deception, you know? If you know the Harry Potter books, I'd like to point to the fact that Delores Umbridge, self-important bureaucrat, is much more scary and dangerous than Voldemort, self-styled Dark Lord, bwahahaha.

Date: 2005-02-25 09:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Saruman is more interesting than Sauron. I think one of the best things in the books is the Scouring of the Shire- where a cut-down-to-size Saruman reappears as Sharkey- and I was sorry they left it out of the film (though I understand it might have seemed anticlimactic.)

Date: 2005-02-25 09:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saskia139.livejournal.com
In one way I didn't miss the Scouring--it's always a painful part of the book for me--but I would like to have seen what Mr. Lee did with "Sharkey". I hope I'm that cool when I'm his age. *g*

Date: 2005-02-25 10:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
We didn't see nearly enough of Lee's Saruman. It was a shame that he got cut from the cinema release of ROTK

Date: 2005-02-25 02:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] four-thorns.livejournal.com
have you seen the extended version of ROTK? saruman's in that, although they completely change what happened in the book.

i would have liked to have seen the scouring of the shire as well, it's one of my favorite parts.

Date: 2005-02-25 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I haven't seen the extended ROTK. But I mean to. One can never have enough of Christopher Lee.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2005-02-25 04:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
It's a movie that is literate about evil.

It also shows how flimsy the power of the tyrant is. How much it depends on assent and collusion.

Date: 2005-02-25 05:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arielstarshadow.livejournal.com
I think this is also something to remember when doing anything creative that involves the portrayal of "villains"; (and yes, I actually checked last year and the semi-colon really does belong outside the quotation marks, unlick the comma and the period. Too bizarre) the more "real" the villain in a book or movie, the scarier they are. Real villains don't know that they are bad/evil/villainous; to them, everything they do makes perfect sense and is logical and good. That is what makes them so scary...that their minds can be so twisted that they see their actions as good.

I'm going to strive for this in my work, but I'm not sure I'm going to succeed.

Date: 2005-02-25 06:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
One of the greatest of all fictional villains is Long John Silver. He's so glamorous and attractive and entertaining that he practically becomes the hero of the book.

Date: 2005-02-25 07:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arielstarshadow.livejournal.com
He's a villain?!?! Just kidding, of course. He certainly does dominate any scene he is in, without a doubt.

Date: 2005-02-25 07:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Stevenson was very good at moral ambiguity. In Kidnapped you've got Alan Breck Stuart- who's a hero that's only a whisker away from being a villain.

Date: 2005-02-25 06:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sina-says.livejournal.com
"...Stalin loved drinking games...

hi. i come to you via [livejournal.com profile] jackiejj. i skipped over to find out more about to whom she sent that creepy, leering little wooden woman. i find your writing interesting (the stalin statement is wonderful...)and hope you don't mind if i add you.

Date: 2005-02-25 06:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
I'm delighted to meet you.

And I'm adding you back.

Date: 2005-02-25 11:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karenkay.livejournal.com
Stalin used to help his kids with their homework.

Date: 2005-02-25 02:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karenkay.livejournal.com
Someone mentioned this at Meeting last year--someone who is a historian and was reading the relatively new biography of Stalin. It came up in a 'discussion' on the banality of evil. (There aren't really discussions in Quaker Meeting, but sometimes several people speak on the same topic.)

Date: 2005-02-25 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
That's fascinating.

No-one is all bad, just as no-one is all good.

I wouldn't have liked to have taught Stalin's kids. Would one have dared give them anything but top marks?

Date: 2005-02-25 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karenkay.livejournal.com
No-one is all bad, just as no-one is all good.

That was the message.

Date: 2005-02-25 04:48 pm (UTC)
jenny_evergreen: (Dark Tree)
From: [personal profile] jenny_evergreen
That's what most people don't want to see; black and white is easier than grey.

Date: 2005-02-26 07:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackiejj.livejournal.com
I saw that movie. It was chilling.

Kate and talked yesterday about how one always knows the truth about oneself, even while one is blustering and pretending on the outside.

But that isn't entirely true--there comes a point, for some people, when the outer person can be just a human-looking shell, while something entirely other lives within.

In Franz Werfel's wonderful book The Song of Bernadette, a novel about the life of Bernadette of Lourdes, she is being interrogated by a bishop, and he asks her: "What is sin?"

She answers: "The love of evil."

It's an interesting answer.

Date: 2005-02-26 09:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
But how does one know what is evil?

The sister in the film believed that she was a good person who was punishing sinners and leading them into the paths of righteousness.

She would happily have agreed with Bernadette.


Date: 2005-02-26 01:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackiejj.livejournal.com
I've just come home after seeing the movie Constantine, which is about
a war between Heaven and Hell, with God as a disinterested scorekeeper.

There are strict rules, and one is that if you commit suicide, you go to Hell, period. The movie's Hell that looks like Dore's illustrations of the Inferno.

Evil and Good aren't mentioned, really. Just rules--Christian rules.

--

As for the nun in the movie, you are correct; and I have read that the Nazis listened to music to calm them while they were doing their "difficult work." They may have even felt--yes, I suppose they did feel--that they were eradicating evil.

--

Having just returned home from the movie Constantine, in which a psychic man battles demons and watches the battle on earth between Heaven and Hell, I am feeling woefully unable to articulate anything coherent about the nature of evil.

(The bleakest part of the movie was the concept of God as disinterested scorekeeper. Evil and good aren't as relevant, or as black-and-white, as the list of rules--Christian rules. For example: if you commit suicide, you're off to Dante and Dore's Inferno Hell. Period.

Of course, there are loopholes, as we know. But suicide doesn't seem to have any.)






Date: 2005-02-26 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackiejj.livejournal.com
Sorry--forgot to edit, and tossed in two versions of the same idea.

Date: 2005-02-26 01:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] four-thorns.livejournal.com
speaking of evil talking the language of religion, "night of the hunter". that's a good one.

Date: 2005-02-26 02:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Certainly is.

I love that film!

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 05:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »